This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2014, 5, 1603–1615, doi:10.3762/bjnano.5.172
Figure 1: Schematic representation of the interface in a nano-glass [5].
Figure 2: (a) As-quenched (from the vapor phase) nanoglassy grains exhibiting paramagnetic behavior, and (b) ...
Figure 3: Schematic representation of phase transformations in the free energy–configuration space.
Figure 4: (a) Sliding/Shear unit, according to the GBS Model. (b) Elevation view of the undeformed oblate sph...
Figure 5: Development of mesoscopic grain/interphase boundary sliding. Shaded grain boundaries of rhombic dod...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2013, 4, 805–806, doi:10.3762/bjnano.4.91
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2013, 4, 517–533, doi:10.3762/bjnano.4.61
Figure 1: Comparison of the diffusivities in nanocrystalline (nc) Cu, Ni and Pd in comparison to the diffusiv...
Figure 2: Work-hardening rate of (Al-1.6 at % Cu) crystals at room temperature after a solution treatment, wa...
Figure 3: Figure showing the analogy between the defect and the chemical microstructures of nanocrystalline m...
Figure 4: Production of nanoglasses by consolidation on nanometer-sized glassy clusters produced by inert-gas...
Figure 5: Synthesis of an Au-based nanoglass by magnetron sputtering. Reproduced with permission from [7].
Figure 6: Constant-current scanning tunneling electron micrograph (STEM) of the polished surface of a Fe90Sc10...
Figure 7: (a) Selected electron diffraction pattern of a Fe25Sc75 nanoglass. Reproduced with permission from [18]...
Figure 8: Upper figure: Positron lifetime of the components τ1 (red line), τ2 (green line) and the mean posit...
Figure 9: (a) q2-Weighted SAXS curves of a 4.5 GPa Fe25Sc75 nanoglass as a function of annealing temperature....
Figure 10: Comparison of the Mössbauer spectra and the corresponding quadrupole splitting (QS) distribution (p...
Figure 11: Relative spectral fraction of the interfacial component versus the inverse size of the glassy regio...
Figure 12: Mössbauer spectra recorded at 295 K for the melt-spun ribbon, the nanosphere powder prior to consol...
Figure 13: Diagram displaying the temperature dependence of the measured magnetic hyperfine field (Bhf) of a m...
Figure 14: Molecular dynamics simulation of the consolidation of a nanoglass at 300 K [27]. The nanoglass is obtai...
Figure 15: Proposed model of the structure of a nanoglass [27]. Reproduced with permission. According to the resul...
Figure 16: Magnetization curves (magnetization versus external magnetic field) of a nanoglass sample (red) and...
Figure 17: Stress–strain curve of a Sc75Fe25 nanoglass and of a melt-spun ribbon with the same chemical compos...
Figure 18: Calculated stress–strain curves for Cu64Zr36 nanoglasses with glassy regions with diameters of 4, 1...
Figure 19: Local atomic shear strain for chemically inhomogeneous (Cu-enriched interfaces) and chemically homo...
Figure 20: Left: Atomic shear strain in Cu64Zr36 nanoglass of 10 nm grain diameter at 8% and 16% total strain....
Figure 21: Cell proliferation at the surface of a melt-spun ribbon and at the surface of a nanoglass with the ...
Figure 22: Production of multiphase nanoglasses by the consolidation of glassy clusters with different chemica...
Figure 23: Structure of a two-phase nanoglass consisting of FeSc and Cu70Sc30 glassy clusters (Figure on the l...
Figure 24: Generation of an electrically charged surface in a nanoporous metal (e.g., Au) if it is immersed in...